این فایل حاوی مطالعه Health Data Check Overview می باشد که به صورت فرمت PowerPoint در 30 اسلاید در اختیار شما عزیزان قرار گرفته است، در صورت تمایل می توانید این محصول را از فروشگاه خریداری و دانلود نمایید.
فهرست
Pioneer Health Network
(Health Data Check (HDC
Financial Benchmarks
Operational Benchmarks
Statistical/Productivity
deskHDC
Dashboard Report
Project Next Steps
(Survey Data Check (SDC
(Performance Data Check(PDC
تصویر محیط برنامه
Structural Health Monitoring Technologies for Civil Engineering Structures
Author:
[ Ahmet Turer ] - Middle East Technical University, Civil Engr. Dept., 06800 Ankara, Turkey
Abstract:
This paper discusses basic principles of Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), how it has evolved and current state-of-the-art. The need for monitoring is categorized under main titles of necessity for SHM. The toolbox of monitoring projects share similar sensors. Most commonly used sensors and their working principles are briefly discussed. The duration of measurement and outcomes obtained from short and long term monitoring are elaborated. Dynamic and static measurements sometimes need to be combined for the maximum gain from monitoring studies. Advanced tools like modal analysis, acoustic emission, ultrasonic pulse velocity, eddy current, NDT techniques are covered in principle. The variety of structure types that are suitable for monitoring are listed and discussed. The conclusions summarizes the past, present, and future of SHM and its applications
Keywords:
structural health monitoring, structures, sensors
پلان های دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کراچی
این دانشگاه شامل 7 دانشکده می باشد که در 3 طبقه استقرار یافتند
Heather A. Joseph, MPH,a Robin Shrestha-Kuwahara, MPH,a Diane Lowry, MPH, MSW,a Lauren A. Lambert, MPH,a
Adelisa L. Panlilio, MD, MPH,b Beth G. Raucher, MD, MSHCM,c James M. Holcombe, MPPA,d Jan Poujade, RN, MS,e
Diane M. Rasmussen, RN,f and Maureen Wilce, MSa
Atlanta, Georgia, New York, New York, Jackson, Mississippi, Portland, Oregon, and Kansas City, Missouri
Background: Despite the known risk of tuberculosis (TB) to health care workers (HCWs), research suggests that many are not fully
adherent with local TB infection control policies. The objective of this exploratory study was to identify factors influencing HCWs’
adherence to policies for routine tuberculin skin tests (TSTs) and treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI).
Methods: Sixteen focus groups were conducted with clinical and nonclinical staff at 2 hospitals and 2 health departments.
Participants were segmented by adherence to TST or LTBI treatment policies. In-depth, qualitative analysis was conducted to
identify facilitators and barriers to adherence.
Results: Among all focus groups, common themes included the perception that the TSTwas mandatory, the belief that conducting
TSTs at the work site facilitated adherence, and a general misunderstanding about TB epidemiology and pathogenesis. Adherent
groups more commonly mentioned facilitators, such as the perception that periodic tuberculin skin testing was protective and the
employee health (EH) provision of support services. Barriers, such as the logistic difficulty in obtaining the TST, the perception that
LTBI treatment was harmful, and a distrust of EH, emerged consistently in nonadherent groups.
Conclusions: This information may be used to develop more effective interventions for promoting HCW adherence to TB
prevention policies. Informed efforts can be implemented in coordination with reevaluations of infection control and EH programs
that may be prompted by the publication of the revised TB infection control guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention in 2005. (Am J Infect Control 2004;32:456-61.)